The runway sets the deadline
Our factory case study describes a product launched 44 days after the first line of code. We use the scope to assess your launch target.
Founders need two things from an engineering partner: speed without a rebuild later, and a straight answer about what the money buys. Our AI Software Factory ships a working product in about six weeks for $60k–$150k depending on complexity, with documentation, tests and acceptance criteria written alongside the code.


Our factory case study describes a product launched 44 days after the first line of code. We use the scope to assess your launch target.
Keep what works, rebuild what breaks under real users and real data.
Code and infrastructure documented for an investor’s technical review.
Senior engineers who tell you what not to build yet.
Agents help produce code and its checks under engineer review. We use the AI Software Factory model for a scoped first working version.
You know the price before we start and the split between what AI accelerates and what needs an engineer.
Node.js or Fastify, React, PostgreSQL, Supabase, Vercel or AWS — mainstream, documented, no exotic lock-in.

Decisions to settle before the first release.

Lovable, Cursor or Claude Code get you to a demo fast. We tell you which parts survive contact with paying users and which need a senior rebuild — before you launch, not after.

Who owns which record, how customers are isolated, what is a plan limit — decided once, lived with for years.

We review which features the first release needs to test the idea. Anything that can wait is kept out of the initial scope.
Signal Mesh’s founders validated their crypto intelligence idea with a prototype. Their sole developer later left.
The prototype validated the idea, but its database allowed any authenticated user to reach all the data. Its roughly 20 Python microservices also needed security work. We kept functional services, rebuilt the frontend and added the missing API layer. Critical access-control issues were addressed before go-live.

The platform went live in six months with a rebuilt frontend and secured API. The AI layer combines retrieval with semantic search; OpenAI, Claude and Grok were tested for the use case.
A working product with tests and docs, $60k–$150k depending on complexity.
What to keep from your vibe-coded version, what to replace, in a written list.
RAG, agents and automations with cost control and evaluation.
A documented backend your next engineer can work with.
Deployment checks and monitoring, with infrastructure costs visible to your team.
Senior engineers working inside your process while you build your own team.
A first release with an agreed scope
We set deadlines once the design is final, counted in working days, not as dates promised in a sales call. You hear about a problem from us, with options, while there is still time to choose.

They thought like product owners, not contractors.

What you want to achieve, by when, with what budget. We say on the call whether we are the right team, and what the smallest useful first step is.

A short workshop with your stakeholders: outcome, hard and soft deadlines, integrations, risks. You get a written scope, a price range and the split between what AI accelerates and what needs a senior engineer.

We build in deployable increments with code review and automated tests. You get a status daily at first, then weekly once trust is there. Scope lives in Linear; conversations happen in Slack.

Monitoring, documentation and runbooks handed over, or a squad that stays. Either way the product can be operated without us.




"Pirxey gave us the full package - frontend, backend, AI, and data - all under one roof, which meant we never had to coordinate multiple vendors. They thought like product owners, not contractors."

"What stayed with me was the communication. Fast, clear, and always with something concrete - a proposal, an update, a solution. We never had to wonder what was happening."

"Their ability to quickly deliver high-quality solutions while maintaining transparency in communication is rare."

"When you propose something to them, they don't simply say yes - they come back with a pro and con. You're not getting a classic developer who simply does and then you have to fix the thinking yourself. If I had another AI idea and wanted to pursue it, I would just use Pirxey."

"Well… didn't know what to expect but honestly, now I'm learning much from you guys. Had no idea an external tech partner can be so pro and organized."

"Their ability to quickly deliver high-quality solutions while maintaining transparency in communication is rare."

The fastest MVPs we shipped were the ones where the founder cut scope with us in week one. Our job is to make that conversation easy and honest.
Delivery and squads

The fastest MVPs we shipped were the ones where the founder cut scope with us in week one. Our job is to make that conversation easy and honest.
AI research and adoption

The fastest MVPs we shipped were the ones where the founder cut scope with us in week one. Our job is to make that conversation easy and honest.
Architecture and APIs

The fastest MVPs we shipped were the ones where the founder cut scope with us in week one. Our job is to make that conversation easy and honest.
Interfaces and design systems
Discuss your project with our AI Architects. No commitment, just clear answers and a roadmap.
Mike KacprowiczBook a callChief Growth Officer