Your product needs a team that can take over

No. We work in your repository, your cloud and the tools your team already uses. If one of them gets in the way of the work, we tell you what and why, and you decide.

With a 30-minute scoping call. We look at what you have and what you need, then propose a first step with its scope and price before any work starts.

The limited first review to scope the work is free. Implementation is a paid engagement, with a fixed scope and price for the first milestone. You see the proposed work and acceptance criteria before approving it.

The limited first review is typically ready within a few business days of receiving access. Missing accounts or undocumented dependencies may require a separate investigation. The full takeover and repair schedule is agreed from the findings.

Only with a documented reason and a comparison with targeted repairs. We keep what works, usually the frontend and your data, and replace what is fragile underneath. In one public case we did start over, because two earlier attempts had left nothing worth keeping, and we told the client before we started.

It makes the slow parts fast. Reading an unfamiliar codebase, tracing dependencies and writing tests that pin down current behavior used to take weeks before anyone dared to change a line. Agents now do most of that reading and drafting in days, so a rescue, a fix or a refactor costs less and starts sooner than it used to. What AI does not do is decide. It can be confidently wrong about why a piece of code exists, so our engineers check its findings, approve every refactor and own the result in your repo.

Most of them. Java and Spring, .NET and C#, PHP and Laravel, Python, Node.js and TypeScript, Go and Ruby on Rails on the backend; React, Angular, Vue, older jQuery frontends and React Native apps; PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB and Supabase on AWS, Azure or GCP. Plus apps built in Lovable, Bolt or Replit. We do not ask you to switch stacks to work with us. A change of stack is only proposed where the review shows a reason.

Yes. Most of what the original developer knew is still in the code, the commit history and the running system. AI agents help us read it back: what each module does, what calls what and which behavior the tests need to protect. Missing access or undocumented dependencies are recorded as constraints on the takeover.

We list what you need to recover (domain, hosting, database, payment and email providers, app stores) and what you can prove you own; it is the first risk in the review. Accounts in someone else's name can only be handed over by that person or the provider, so we cannot promise to recover them.

Usually. Where the builder allows an export, we move the code and the database into your GitHub and your cloud and start from there. If it does not, the review says what it takes to run the app outside the builder.

We plan for that first: a transition around the app's dependencies, agreed with you, with small releases and a rollback for each one.

We can, as a maintenance stream under a scope you approve. Every change goes through your repo with documentation, so a future in-house team or another vendor can take it from there without us.

Yes. Three public cases, three verdicts: a Lovable travel app we kept and hardened, Signal Mesh, where we kept the working services and replaced the rest, and Elite Medical Prep, where we started over after two failed attempts. A New York construction developer came to us with a first version built offshore that nobody trusted, and the project was on track to be shut down. We rebuilt the backend from scratch, took the empty product-owner seat and went from written off to live in one month, in scope and on schedule. The rebuild cost about 400 unplanned hours; what we would do differently is push harder up front for a defined scope and dedicated analysis time. Signal Mesh, a crypto platform whose developer left, went live six months after we took it over. Neither case is a standard deadline for your project.