All Briefs
Mission Brief · 022—

How ready are you, really?

Every first call starts the same way: the company wants AI, and nobody can say where the data lives, who would own the rules, or what the first project should be. We built a second brain for 130 people, we run a monthly survey on how it is going, and we ship first versions in six weeks, so we know which six things decide whether an AI project lands. Below they are twelve questions. Pick the sentence that sounds like your company today; the result stays in your browser, and our own card sits next to yours.

12
questions, two per pillar, four sentences each; an I don’t know that counts but never scores; a band after eight
77
answers to our own monthly Pulse in September 2026, 69% at Crew level or above after three editions; the People pillar is the one we can put a number on
25
tools our second brain reads with each person’s own logins, autumn 2026; the Data and Plumbing pillars as we live them
Start the scorecard
The scorecard · interactive

Pick the sentence that sounds like you.

Four sentences per question, scored 1, 2, 4 and 5. Pick I don’t know where you cannot answer; it counts, it never scores. The band appears after eight scored answers. Press Load our answers to see how we score ourselves, honestly, in October 2026.

Readiness scorecard · self-reported · nothing leaves your browser

Pick the sentence that sounds like your company today.

Twelve questions, two per pillar, four sentences each. Pick I don’t know when you cannot answer; a band appears after 8 scored answers.

0 of 12 answered. Answer at least 8 to see a score.

Data

Can an assistant reach your records, and can it say where an answer came from? At Pirxey: Our second brain reads twenty-five tools with each person's own logins, and the index tells it what to open first.

– of 50 of 2 answered
1Where does the knowledge an assistant would need live?
2If an assistant's answer were challenged, could you show where it came from?

Reason

Is there a business reason with a number on it, or a demo that impressed someone? At Pirxey: Every brief we publish starts from one question we actually had, with the count that answered it.

– of 50 of 2 answered
3Why does your company want AI?
4Who is accountable when an AI idea does not get used?

Rules

If an answer is challenged, does somebody own the decision, and is there a trail? At Pirxey: We keep an inventory of every AI system in use and a standing group that approves a new use of a model on company data.

– of 50 of 2 answered
5Do you know which AI tools are in use, including the unofficial ones?
6Is it written down what may be sent to a hosted model?

People

Do the people who will use it know what it is bad at? At Pirxey: Our monthly Pulse: 77 answers in September, 69% at Crew level or above after three editions.

– of 50 of 2 answered
7Can your leadership explain what a model is bad at?
8How many of your people used AI on a real task last month?

Plumbing

Can you connect, watch and change a model without a heroic week? At Pirxey: One maintained setup of connections, checks on every change, and a loop with a person at five stops.

– of 50 of 2 answered
9How would a model reach your systems today?
10How hard is it to change the model or the prompt behind a working feature?

Backlog

Is there a ranked list, or a pile of wishes? At Pirxey: We rank by value against the number of systems touched, and the first working version has a six-week limit.

– of 50 of 2 answered
11Is there a list of AI ideas, and is it ranked?
12How will you know an AI project worked?

Your scorecard · 0 of 12 answered

Answer at least 8 of the 12 questions to see a band. 0 so far.

Self-reported, not an audit: the score says where to look, not what is true. Nothing is sent anywhere. With Remember on, the answers stay in this browser profile until you press Clear.

Six pillars · how we do it

What each pillar asks, and what we do about it.

Six things we check before an AI project, in plain words. Under each: how it works at Pirxey as of autumn 2026, and the brief that shows it.

01
where it lives, who owns it

Data

Can an assistant reach your records, and can it say where an answer came from? Not a data lake: a list of the systems that hold what you would ask about, an owner per system, and the sensitive sets marked before anyone connects a tool. Our second brain reads twenty-five tools with each person’s own logins, and the index tells it what to open first. Tracing an answer back to its source still takes a person; that is our open item here.

— briefs 015 and 016 · our own count, autumn 2026
02
a number, or a demo

Reason

Is there a business reason with a number on it, or a demo that impressed someone? The test is a business owner who will be asked about adoption, not the engineer who built it. We have two or three named problems with a measure each, and every brief we publish starts from one question we actually had. The rule for when a pilot earns more budget is the part we have not written down.

— brief 020 · our own answers, October 2026
03
inventory, approval, trail

Rules

If an answer is challenged, does somebody own the decision, and is there a trail? We keep an inventory of every AI system in use, including the unofficial ones, and a standing group that approves a new use of a model on company data. What may go to a hosted model is written down, shared knowledge is checked before it is saved, and a person approves what leaves the company. Brief 017 is the long version.

— brief 017 · our own answers, October 2026
04
leaders first, then the Pulse

People

Do the people who will use it know what it is bad at? Measured by use on real tasks, not by workshop attendance. Our leaders used the assistant weekly before anyone else was asked to, which is the honest reason the company followed. The monthly Pulse had 77 answers in September, 69% at Crew level or above after three editions, and it asks every month who is blocked by what.

— brief 014 · 77 answers, Sep 2026
05
connect, watch, change

Plumbing

Can you connect, watch and change a model without a heroic week? One maintained setup of connections with the person’s own logins, logs someone reads, checks on every change, and a loop with a person at five stops. The six-week build in brief 018 ran nine checks on every change; the saved set of questions that runs before a prompt change is what we add next.

— briefs 017 and 018 · our own answers, October 2026
06
a ranked list, or a pile

Backlog

Is there a ranked list, or a pile of wishes? Value against the number of systems touched, one table, the top item in progress with a date, and a baseline measured before the start. We rank quarterly and give a first working version six weeks. The baseline before the start is the step we skip most often, which is why our own card points there first.

— briefs 005 and 018 · our own answers, October 2026
What a self-report cannot tell you

Where to look, not what is true.

A self-assessment is a conversation starter with yourself. It is answered by the people who built the current setup, about the setup they built, so it leans generous. Ours does too: we loaded our answers so you have something real to compare with, not because they are audited. A budget decision or a board sign-off wants someone to read the data and the code, not the founder’s opinion of them.

What the band can do is point. If Rules is your lowest pillar, the three first moves are cheap and take a month, and you will find out quickly whether the organisation wants this. If Data is lowest, expect the first project to spend most of its time on plumbing, and plan for that instead of being surprised by it. Our own card points at Backlog: we skip the baseline before a project starts, and the card is right.

For what to do with the result, brief 009 turns five plain scores into a ninety-day plan that starts with one repeatable workflow. This brief is the diagnosis; that one is the plan.

Evidence · four cards, each labeled

Our numbers, and one idea we borrowed.

Each card says what kind of source it is and whether whoever published it sells something in this category.

77
answers to our monthly Pulse in September 2026; 69% at Crew level or above after three editions.
The People pillar is the one we can put a number on from outside our own heads: brief 014 publishes the survey, totals only, three editions. Self-reported too, which is why it sits next to the scorecard rather than above it.
Survey · our own, 77 answers, Sep 2026 · brief 014
25
tools one person’s assistant reaches with that person’s own logins, autumn 2026.
The Data and Plumbing pillars as we live them: no company-wide login, no new database, the access people already had. Brief 017 explains what we divided and what we did not; brief 015 is the map.
Our own count · briefs 015 and 017
44 days
from the first line of code to live, nine checks on every change, a person at five stops in the loop.
The Plumbing and Backlog pillars at full speed: a six-week first version with checks that run on their own and people who decide. The baseline before the start is the thing that build also skipped.
Our own brief · 018, six weeks to launch
6 pillars
The idea of scoring a company on six pillars and reading the total as a maturity band is borrowed.
We read a software company’s published readiness guide before writing our own six; it is a good structure and it is not ours. The questions, the sentences, the band names, the first moves and the answers are. The publisher sells readiness reviews, which is a reason to try a self-assessment first and a reason to label the source.
External guide · Netguru, 2026 · the publisher sells assessments
Mission control standing by

Bring your scorecard. We will tell you what to check first.

We write custom software. Some pieces are ready-made. We join your team and work alongside it. Paste the text your scorecard produced and we will say which of the three first moves we would start with in your case, and what we would want to see before anything is built.